Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marsha Epstein's avatar

I don't understand why the California legislature gave in to PG&E to make solar less attractive to homeowners. If we are really interested in clean free energy there's nothing better. We put in solar about 10 years ago and our electric bill is zero! A 3200 square foot house, 5 computers, 3 TVs and a zero bill. Furthermore, our trueup showed that we had excess energy of over $600. I would like to see that law rescinded and everything done to make solar attractive to homeowners. Manufacture and installation of solar panels produced good jobs--an industry that is much weakened by this badly considered law. With increasing demand of data centers and the need to keep an old nuclear power plant at Diablo Canyon on-line to meet our clean energy needs, we have destroyed a safer more economical way of producing much-needed electricity,

PaulM's avatar

Data centers have a ton of environmental concerns, one of which is electricity demand. Another is cooling water. Is there a plan to incentivize data centers to install their own solar collectors as part of their designs, and to use the latest technology to minimize water consumption? Stockton and other places already have water shortages.

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?